Baalbek – ‘Heliopolis’, ‘City of the Sun’

The stone of the South—Hadjar el Gouble, The Stone of the Pregnant Woman—Hadjar el Hibla

The stone of the South—Hadjar el Gouble, The Stone of the Pregnant Woman—Hadjar el Hibla

The temple at Ba’albek is famous for its extraordinarily large foundation stones (The largest in the world). These stones also qualify as the largest cut-stones in the history of mankind.

Location: Beqaa Valley, Lebanon.

There is no contemporary testimony for the construction, which dates back at least to Phoenician times.

Table of Contents:



Ba’albek: Heliopolis

The Origin of the Name Ba’albek:

‘The first syllable ‘Baal’ corresponds to the Sun of the ancient Phoenicians. The Syriac termination ‘Bak’ means town; the Phoenician ending ‘Beka’ means ‘country’. However, in a recently discovered Phoenician inscription, the word ‘Beka’ has the meaning of town. In Egyptian, the word ‘Bak’ also means town’. (1)

The Temple complex

The Temple complex

We can conclude that the name Baalbek means ‘The city/town of the Sun’.

The Beqqa valley sits at 1150m above sea level and was recently occupied by armed forces (2004).

While Lebanon is mentioned in the bible for its cedar-wood, it is perhaps curious that the Ba’albek temple was not also mentioned. (except perhaps as Solomon’s temple in Lebanon). The stones used for the construction of the temple platform at Baalbek stand on record as the largest known quarried, cut-stones in prehistory (Three of which are regularly estimated at 800 – 1,200 tons each).

The existing foundations of the temple were built over by the Romans, who dedicated it the temple to Jupiter.

Chronology:

The origins of the site and the first builders are lost to us. However, it is often generally accepted that the foundations of the temple were constructed by the Phoenicians (1),(2).

Weaver (3), mentions the temple of Ba’albek and the Phoenicians in the same passage:

” … turn our thoughts to the temple of Solomon – to his own house, to his house of the forest of Lebanon – the former of which, even the second temple, we know from Josephus, was made of stones immensely large; and as to the latter, the sacred historian tells us, that ” the foundation was of costly stones; even great stones; stones of ten cubits and stones of eight cubits.” And if we take into account that Huran, a Phoenician, and his servants, who were Phoenicians, assisted in building Solomon’s temple…”

The Main Temple(The Temple of Jupiter)

The western wall of the 'Temple of Jupiter'

The western wall of the ‘Temple of Jupiter’

The photo (left) of the western wall of the ‘Temple of Jupiter’, shows the layers of foundation stones which were brought to light when the Arabs dug out moats around the edifice. The basement of the terrace is seen to be supported by six immense stones measuring 33 ft long each and 14ft high (right of the person in photo). These stones hold the weight of the three giant stones (the so called Trilithon), which were intended to support the last row, that should have been the higher edge of the terrace, but was never built.

The similarity between the ‘cyclopean’ masonry in the foundations of the temple and the unfinished block (in the quarry) suggests that the stone in the quarry (see below), was cut in the earliest stages of the temples development.

The early date of the temple foundations and the advanced skills of the masons reveals the presence of an unknown page of history as the only two ancient cultures in the middle-east with monoliths anywhere near this size were at Giza in Egypt and Jerusalem in Israel.

We are offered a possible clue to the builders through the following extract (from Miracle of Ages), which adequately describes the now famous conversation between Herodotus and Manetho:

‘In the course of his questioning he (Herodotus) encountered one Manetho, an Egyptian High Priest, scholar and Historian, with whom he conversed at length thru the agency of an interpreter. Manetho informed his distinguished guest that the architect of the huge mass of stone was one “Philition”, or “Suphis”, of a people known as the “Hyksos”, that is “Shepherd Kings”. According to Manetho, the Shepherd Kings were “a people of ignoble race” who came from some unknown land in the East; they were a nomadic band who numbered not less than 280,000 souls; they brought with them their families and all mobile possessions, including vast flocks of sheep and herds of cattle; and they “had the confidence to invade Egypt, and subdued it without a battle”. this same people, said Manetho, overthrew the then-reigning Dynasty, stamped out idolatry and endeavored to firmly establish in the place thereof the worship of the One true God having completed the Great pyramid, migrated eastward into the land afterwards known as Judea and founded there the city of Salem, which later became Jerusalem, the Holy city.’ (5)

According to Estfan Doweihi, the Maronite Patriarch of Lebanon: ‘Tradition states that the fortress of Baalbek… is the most ancient building in the world. Cain, the son of Adam, built it in the year 133 of the creation, during a fit of raving madness. He gave it the name of his son Enoch and peopled it with giants who were punished for their iniquities by the flood.’ (4)

The photo above illustrates how the three large stones (trilithon), rest upon six other smaller stones (each of which has an estimated weight of around 400 tons).

The photo above illustrates how the three large stones (Trilithon), rest upon six other smaller stones (each of which has an estimated weight of around 400 tons).


Several other large stones are visible along the (front-right) Northern wall...

Several other large stones are visible along the (front-right) Northern wall…

Estimate for the total weight of the nine stones in western wall.

3 x 800 tons = 2,400 tons
6 x 400 tons = 2,400 tons

Total for all 9 stones = 4,800 tons.

Archaeoastronomy:

The temple is cardinally aligned and opens to face the east, which Lockyer concluded to be a result of deliberate orientation to the equinoctial sunrise (2). This information conforms to the fact that the temple was originally named ‘The city of the Sun’ by the Phoenicians in dedication to the sun-god Ba’al, and again later by the Greeks, who dedicated the temple to Apollo (Their sun god), and called it Heliopolis.

Alignments:

The proximity of the granite quarry to the temple appears at first glance to explain the location of the temple, however, other ancient sites such as Giza or Stonehenge (etc, etc), were located up to 500 Km distant from the nearest source of granite, and it has been shown that the temple at Baalbek is aligned with other prominent ancient sites, which opens the possibility that the determination of the site may also have been realized according to geodetic principles.

The temple was called 'Heliopolis' by the Greeks. The Egyptian Heliopolis near Giza is located almost exactly  5° west and 4° south of Ba'albek.

The temple was called ‘Heliopolis’ by the Greeks. The Egyptian Heliopolis near Giza is located almost exactly 5° west and 4° south of Ba’albek.

As well as being cardinally aligned and composed of immense blocks, Ba’albek shares a geometric relationship with Giza, Egypt. As well as signifying the knowledge of a globe, (divided by 360°), this very specific separation of both longitudes and latitudes between the two sites has a secondary significance in that the angle created is (also almost exactly) 51° 51′, which is the same angle as that of the exterior faces of the great pyramid at Giza, a site invested with numerous geometric and astronomical proportions.

The same ‘geodetic fingerprint’ can be seen at other significant Egyptian Temple complexes like Karnak (Thebes) and Giza, and appears to be related to the positioning of sacred places in the middle east and Europe from a geodetic center-point at Giza (or perhaps at Heliopolis). Although it is still in its infancy, the study of prehistoric geodesy is now being recognized as a serious scientific study both then and now.


The Stone of the Pregnant Woman:

Arguably, the largest cut-stone in the World.

The stone of the South

The stone of the South

The stone of the South—Hadjar el Gouble, The Stone of the Pregnant Woman—Hadjar el Hibla

Dimensions – There are several varying sources regarding the dimensions of this stone. As such, they have all been compiled in the following:

69 ft long, 16 ft wide and 10 ft high = 11040 ft³ or 20.9m x 4.8m x 3m = 300 m³.

Estimated weight – 1,500 (1) – 2,000 Tons (Fix).

The same is true of the three foundation blocks ‘The Trilithon‘, in the nearby Baalbek temple, which have the following dimensions: The largest is 65 feet in length, the second 64 ft 10 inches; and the third 63ft 2 inches. They are all 14 ft and 6 inches in height, and 12 feet in thickness. Each block is therefore 350 cubic yards and they are estimated to weigh 750 – 1,000 tons each (1).

How was the stone moved – The ancient manipulation of such large stones is still a largely debated phenomena. Common to other similar ancient construction feats, there are no records to testify the means or date of this extraordinary achievement. However, the similarity to other extremely early middle-eastern masonry achievements, such as those seen at Giza or Abydos, in Egypt and the foundations of the ‘Temple of the mount’ in Jerusalem, have not gone un-noticed. Likewise, there appears to be a connection in the type of stone used, which was invariably quartzite (Red granite in the case of Baalbek).

In the past such achievements were accredited to ‘The hand of God’, ‘Giants’ and more recently ‘Alien life’. However, we must be careful not to lose ourselves in disbelief. There is no doubt that these stones were moved, and as with most such unexplainable events, there is likely to be a rational answer if we look for it. For example, the Colossi of Memnon, in Egypt are both estimated to weigh 1000 tons each, and their movement is clearly depicted in hieroglyphs.

Why was the stone moved – Just as important as understanding how they were moved, is the question of why such immense stones were moved. (Any increase in advantage gained by using large stones is balanced against the increased difficulties of moving them). In Egypt, for example, we can see numerous 85-ton stones that were moved over 500 km to their resting places in and around the great pyramid.

The foundation stones for the Ba’albek temple were moved uphill to their resting place.

The proximity of the quarry to the temple is close enough that it could be argued that the stones did not need to be moved, at least in terms of laying a foundation, as it would have been more effective to build the temple directly into the bedrock. This raises the question, why bother at all?

While large stones are clearly structurally advantageous to a temple foundation, the extra-ordinary size of these suggest that another factor may have been involved in this choice of design.

The idea that the temple was solar reasonably justifies the moving of the stones uphill, as placing the temple on top of the hill enabled it to capture the rays of the sun at the appropriate times of the year (the equinoxes). The choice of such large stones however, as with many ancient structures, might be better explained through the idea of a form of worship of the stone itself.

The 'stone of the South' in its quarry

The ‘stone of the South’ in its quarry



Ba’albek: A gallery of Images.

The Ba'albek temple complex from above.

The Ba’albek temple complex from above.


The western wall of the 'Temple of Jupiter'

The western wall of the ‘Temple of Jupiter’


The photo above illustrates how the three large stones (trilithon), rest upon six other smaller stones (each of which has an estimated weight of around 400 tons).

The photo above illustrates how the three large stones (Trilithon), rest upon six other smaller stones (each of which has an estimated weight of around 400 tons).


The Stone of the Pregnant Woman—Hadjar el Hibla

The Stone of the Pregnant Woman—Hadjar el Hibla

References:

  1. Michael M. Alouf. History of Baalbek. 1999. Book Tree Publ.)
  2. Sir. J. N. Lockyer. The Dawn of Astronomy. 1964. M.I.T. Press.
  3. R. Weaver. Monumenta Antiqua. 1840. J. B. Nichols and Sons Publ.
  4. A.F. Alford, ‘The Phoenix Solution’, 1998, Hodder & Stoughton.
  5. Worth Smith. Miracle of the Ages: The Great Pyramid. 1934. The Elizabeth Towne Co., Inc, USA.

Return to Baalbek

Advertisements

One thought on “Baalbek – ‘Heliopolis’, ‘City of the Sun’

  1. Pingback: Baalbek | Zecharia Sitchin Index

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s